Prospect Connect Media
Back to BlogDilapidations

How Dilapidations Surveyors Can Turn Case Studies Into New Instructions

James Thomas··17 min read
Dilapidations case study visibility

The hidden asset in every dilapidations practice

You achieved a 58% reduction on a terminal dilapidations claim last quarter. The tenant was facing a £410,000 schedule from the landlord's surveyor. You reviewed the claim, identified items that fell outside the tenant's repairing covenant, challenged the costings, and settled the matter at £172,000. The client was delighted.

And then what happened?

The file went into the cabinet. The invoice was paid. You moved on to the next instruction. That result, one of the most persuasive pieces of marketing material your practice will ever produce, disappeared into a filing system where nobody outside your office will ever see it.

This is what I call the case study visibility problem. It affects almost every dilapidations practice I speak to. You have extraordinary results. Results that would convince any commercial tenant, landlord, or solicitor to instruct you. But those results are invisible to the people who are actively searching for a surveyor right now.

A case study is not a boast. It is proof. And proof is the scarcest commodity in professional services marketing.

Why case results beat every other marketing asset

Think about what happens when a commercial tenant receives a schedule of dilapidations. They are worried. The number at the bottom of the schedule looks enormous. They do not know whether it is fair, overstated, or completely fabricated. They need someone who has dealt with this before and got a good result.

Now imagine two surveyor websites. The first says "we handle dilapidations claims for commercial tenants." The second says "we reviewed a terminal schedule of £285,000 for a retail tenant in Manchester and negotiated a settlement of £118,000, a 59% reduction."

Which surveyor gets the call?

The answer is obvious. Specific results are more persuasive than general claims. Everyone says they are experienced. Everyone says they get good results. But almost nobody shows the evidence.

This is your competitive advantage. The bar for dilapidations marketing is on the floor. Most practice websites have a single paragraph about dilapidations buried on a services page. No case studies. No results. No evidence of any kind. The first firm in any city that publishes detailed, anonymised case studies with real numbers will stand out dramatically.

Case studies work because they do three things at once. They demonstrate expertise, because you clearly know what you are doing. They build trust, because you are willing to be specific about outcomes. And they reduce perceived risk, because the prospective client can see that someone in a similar situation got a good result.

No other marketing asset does all three.

The anatomy of a dilapidations case study that converts

Not all case studies are created equal. A vague paragraph about "achieving a favourable outcome" does nothing. The case studies that actually generate enquiries follow a specific structure.

Start with the situation

Set the scene. What type of property? What was the lease structure? What triggered the dilapidations claim? Were you acting for the landlord or the tenant?

The reader needs to recognise their own situation in yours. If they are a retail tenant facing a terminal schedule, they want to see that you have handled that exact scenario. If they are a landlord preparing a claim against a departing tenant, they want to see landlord-side experience.

Be specific about the property type and sector without revealing the actual identity of the client. "A 12,000 sq ft office unit in central Leeds, occupied under a 15-year FRI lease" tells the reader everything they need to know without naming anyone.

Define the problem

What was wrong? Why did the client need your help? This is where you establish the stakes.

For tenant-side work, the problem is usually an overstated claim. "The landlord's surveyor had prepared a schedule totalling £340,000. Several items related to improvements the tenant had made at their own expense and which were not the tenant's obligation to remove under the lease terms."

For landlord-side work, the problem might be a tenant who disputes legitimate claims, or a departing tenant who has stripped out fixtures they should have left in place.

The problem section creates tension. The reader thinks, "that sounds like my situation." Good. That is exactly what you want.

Explain your approach

This is the section that most surveyors skip, and it is the section that matters most for building trust. What did you actually do?

Did you prepare a response to the schedule line by line? Did you commission a Section 18 valuation to cap the claim at the diminution in value of the landlord's reversion? Did you identify items that fell outside the tenant's repairing covenant? Did you challenge the landlord's costings by obtaining independent quotations?

The technical detail here is the difference between a case study that builds confidence and one that says nothing. A solicitor reading your case study wants to see that you followed the Dilapidations Protocol, that you understand the law, and that your methodology is rigorous.

You do not need to write a dissertation. Three to four sentences that describe your approach in clear, plain English is enough. The reader should finish this section thinking, "they clearly know what they are doing."

Show the result

This is the headline. The number. The percentage reduction. The saving.

"The claim was settled at £142,000 against an original schedule of £340,000. That is a 58% reduction, saving the tenant £198,000."

Be precise. Use real figures (anonymised, of course). The specific number is infinitely more persuasive than "a significant reduction" or "a favourable settlement." Vague language sounds like you are hiding something. Precise figures sound like you are proud of your work.

If the case went to negotiation, say so. If you used alternative dispute resolution, mention it. If the matter was resolved without litigation, that is worth highlighting because clients are terrified of court proceedings and want to know you can avoid them.

Close with the takeaway

End with a lesson that the reader can apply to their own situation. "This case illustrates why tenants should always seek independent advice before accepting a schedule of dilapidations at face value. Overstated claims are common, and a qualified surveyor can identify items that should be challenged."

The takeaway positions you as an educator, not just a service provider. It gives the reader something useful even if they do not hire you today. That generosity builds trust and keeps your name in their mind.

Structuring case studies for search engines

A case study that lives on your website should be optimised for the searches your prospective clients are making. This is not about keyword stuffing. It is about writing naturally for the questions people actually type into Google.

Title and URL structure

Your case study title should include the property type, the location, and the result. "Dilapidations Case Study: 58% Reduction for Retail Tenant in Manchester" is a good title. It tells Google what the page is about. It tells the reader what they will find. It includes terms that people actually search for.

The URL should be clean and descriptive. /case-studies/retail-dilapidations-manchester-58-percent-reduction is far better than /case-study-14 or /resources/cs-2026-003.

Heading structure

Use H2 headings that match the structure I described above: Situation, Problem, Approach, Result. These headings help Google understand the page and they help readers scan the content quickly.

If you have a collection of case studies on a single page, each case study should have its own H2 with the key details. "Office Dilapidations in Birmingham: £210,000 Schedule Reduced to £89,000" works as a scannable heading.

Internal linking

Every case study should link to your main dilapidations service page. If you have written blog articles about related topics, like how the Protocol works, or what a Section 18 valuation involves, link to those as well. Internal linking helps Google understand the relationship between your pages and it keeps visitors on your site longer.

Schema markup

If your web developer can implement it, add FAQ schema or HowTo schema to your case study pages. This can help your content appear in rich results in Google, giving you more visibility without paying for ads. At minimum, ensure each case study page has proper meta titles and descriptions that include the result and the location.

Using case studies on Google Ads landing pages

When someone clicks on a Google Ad for "dilapidations surveyor London," they land on a page that needs to convince them to get in touch. Case studies are the most powerful element on that page.

Here is how to structure a Google Ads landing page for dilapidations:

Headline: Speak to the reader's problem. "Received a Schedule of Dilapidations? Get Expert Advice Before You Respond."

Subheadline: Establish credibility with a result. "We have reduced dilapidations claims by 40-65% for commercial tenants across the South East."

Social proof section: Three to four case study summaries. Each one should be three lines. The original claim. The settled amount. The percentage reduction. This section does more work than any paragraph of sales copy ever will.

Call to action: A simple form or phone number. "Book a free 15-minute review of your schedule." Make it easy. Make it obvious. Make it the only thing you want them to do.

The case study summaries on a landing page do not need to be full write-ups. They need to be snapshots. Quick hits of proof that show the reader you have done this before and you have done it well.

I have seen dilapidations landing pages convert at 8-12% when they include three or more case study results. Without case studies, the same page structure converts at 2-3%. That is the difference proof makes.

Email sequences to solicitor firms

Commercial property solicitors are one of your most important referral sources. And most of them are hearing from you only when you meet at a RICS event or a local property networking lunch. That is not a system. That is hope.

A structured email sequence puts your case results in front of solicitors on a regular schedule. Here is a four-email sequence that works.

Email 1: The introduction. Short. Personal. "I run a specialist dilapidations practice in [city]. We recently achieved a 55% reduction on a terminal claim for a retail tenant facing a £290,000 schedule. I thought this might be of interest given your commercial property work." Include a link to the full case study on your website.

Email 2: The educational piece. Sent one week later. Share a useful article or insight. "I have written a short guide on how the Dilapidations Protocol affects settlement timelines. It covers the areas where we see solicitors and surveyors misaligning on expectations." Link to the article. No sales pitch.

Email 3: Another case study. Sent two weeks later. Different property type, different city, different result. Show breadth. "We were instructed by a landlord pursuing a departing tenant for £180,000 in dilapidations. The tenant disputed virtually everything. We prepared a robust response and settled at £164,000 through negotiation, avoiding litigation entirely." Solicitors love the phrase "avoiding litigation entirely."

Email 4: The offer. Sent two weeks after that. "I would welcome 15 minutes on the phone to understand how your firm handles dilapidations referrals and whether there is a fit. I am not looking to replace your existing surveyors. I am looking to be on your list for when you need additional capacity or a specific expertise." Offer a time. Make it easy.

Four emails. Six weeks. Zero pressure. You have shown results, provided value, and made a specific, low-commitment offer. The solicitor may not respond to email one. They may not respond to email two. But by email four, they know your name, they have seen your results, and they know you are a specialist.

Personalisation matters

Generic emails get deleted. Before you email a solicitor firm, spend five minutes on their website. Find the names of their commercial property partners. Reference their practice area. If they have handled a notable case, mention it. "I noticed your firm acted on the Riverside Park lease dispute" signals that you have done your homework.

This takes more time than a mail merge. But one personalised email that gets read is worth more than 200 generic emails that get binned.

LinkedIn content strategy for dilapidations surveyors

LinkedIn is where commercial property professionals spend time. Solicitors, managing agents, property directors, landlords, they are all scrolling. And most dilapidations surveyors are not posting anything.

Here is a LinkedIn content plan built around your case studies.

The case study post

Take a completed case. Write it as a short LinkedIn post. Keep it under 300 words. Open with the result. "We reduced a £340,000 dilapidations claim to £142,000 for a retail tenant in Manchester. Here is how."

Then give two or three sentences about the approach. What did you find? What was overstated? How did you challenge it?

Close with a takeaway. "If you have received a schedule of dilapidations, do not accept it at face value. Get independent advice first."

These posts consistently outperform generic "thought leadership" content. Numbers are compelling. Specific results stop the scroll. And every solicitor who sees the post files your name away for the next time they need a surveyor referral.

The process explainer post

Pick one element of dilapidations and explain it in plain English. "What is a Section 18 valuation and why does it matter?" "What happens if a tenant ignores a schedule of dilapidations?" "How does the Dilapidations Protocol affect settlement negotiations?"

These posts establish expertise. They also attract engagement from people asking follow-up questions, which gives you an opportunity to have a public conversation that demonstrates your knowledge.

The market observation post

Share what you are seeing in the market. "We are handling more interim dilapidations claims this year than ever before. Landlords are not waiting for lease expiry to pursue tenants who are allowing properties to fall into disrepair." This type of content shows you are active and current, not just technically competent.

Posting frequency and timing

Post two to three times per week. Tuesday to Thursday mornings tend to perform best for professional audiences. Mix case study posts, process explainers, and market observations. Do not post the same type every time.

Reply to every comment. LinkedIn's algorithm rewards posts that generate conversation, and your replies keep the post visible for longer. If a solicitor comments on your case study post asking a question, answer it thoroughly and publicly. That exchange is marketing in itself.

Repurposing one case study across every channel

Here is the real power of the case study approach. One completed dilapidations case generates content for every marketing channel you use.

Start with the full case study on your website. That is your anchor content. Optimise it for search, link to your service page, and make sure it is easy to find.

Then extract a summary for your Google Ads landing page. Three lines. Original claim, settled amount, percentage reduction.

Write a 250-word LinkedIn post about the case. Focus on the result and the approach.

Include the case study link in your next email to solicitor firms. "Here is a recent case that illustrates how we approach overstated terminal schedules."

If you create Google Ads for dilapidations terms, use the result in your ad copy. "We reduced a £340,000 claim by 58%. Book a free schedule review."

One case. Five channels. Weeks of content. And this is not fabricated marketing material. It is a real result from real work you actually did. That authenticity is what makes it so powerful.

Most practices complete multiple dilapidations cases every month. If you turn just one of those into a structured case study each month, you will have a library of 12 case studies within a year. That library becomes the foundation of your entire marketing operation.

Some surveyors worry about sharing case results publicly. The concern is understandable. Dilapidations matters involve commercial negotiations and the parties may have settled on the basis that terms remain confidential.

Here is how to handle it.

First, anonymise everything. Remove client names, landlord names, specific property addresses, and any details that could identify the parties. "A retail tenant in central Manchester" is sufficient. You do not need "Acme Retail Ltd at 42 Deansgate."

Second, check your engagement terms. Some letters of engagement include confidentiality clauses. If yours do, you may need to seek consent before publishing a case study. Most clients are happy for anonymised results to be shared, but ask the question.

Third, aggregate where necessary. If you cannot share a specific case, you can share aggregate results. "Across our last 30 terminal dilapidations instructions, we achieved an average reduction of 47% from the original schedule." This is less powerful than a specific case study but still far more persuasive than saying nothing.

The key principle is this: you can almost always share the outcome without revealing the identity. A 58% reduction on a £340,000 claim in Manchester tells the reader everything they need to know about your ability. It tells them nothing about who the client was.

Frequently asked questions

How many case studies do I need before I start publishing?

Start with three. That is enough to show a pattern rather than a single lucky result. Aim for variety in property type (office, retail, industrial), in claim size, and in whether you acted for the landlord or tenant. Three case studies published today are worth more than ten case studies you plan to write next year.

What if my results are not as dramatic as 50-60% reductions?

Not every case produces a headline number. A 25% reduction on a well-prepared schedule is still a significant saving. And some of your best case studies might not be about the percentage at all. A case where you helped a landlord prepare a robust schedule that was accepted in full is equally compelling to a landlord audience. Results do not have to be dramatic. They have to be real.

Should I publish case studies as blog posts or on a dedicated page?

Both. Create a dedicated case studies section on your website where all your results are collected in one place. Then publish individual case studies as blog articles with more detail and supporting context. The dedicated page gives visitors a quick overview. The blog articles give Google more content to index and rank.

How do I measure whether case studies are generating instructions?

Track three metrics. First, page views on your case study pages, are people finding and reading them? Second, enquiry source, when a new client gets in touch, ask how they found you. Third, conversion rate on landing pages with and without case studies. If you are running Google Ads, A/B test a landing page with case study results against one without. The difference will be obvious.

Stop hiding your best work

You trained for years to become a chartered building surveyor. You passed your APC. You built your technical expertise through hundreds of cases. And the results you achieve for clients are genuinely impressive.

Those results are the most powerful marketing asset your practice owns. More powerful than any brand redesign, any social media strategy, any networking event. But only if people can see them.

Every month that a 55% reduction case study sits in a filing cabinet instead of on your website is a month of missed enquiries. Every week that a solicitor in your city does not know about your track record is a week where they might refer work to someone else.

The fix is straightforward. Pick your three best recent results. Write them up using the structure in this article. Publish them on your website. Share them on LinkedIn. Send them to the solicitors you want to work with.

If you want help building this into a system that generates instructions month after month, book a call with our team and we will show you how it works for dilapidations practices like yours.


James Thomas
James Thomas

Founder & Director, Prospect Connect Media

Former compliance specialist at Herbert Smith Freehills and Macfarlanes LLP. 10+ years building growth systems for regulated industries. £150M+ in attributed client revenue.

Ready to grow?

If this resonated, book a 15-minute call. No pitch deck. Just an honest conversation.

Book a Discovery Call